|
Success of a BPM project is in identifying objective outcome metrics
and their drivers, say Christian Mertin and Prithwijit Chaki
Governance and BPM
BPM is neither a product nor a system.
It is, rather, a constantly evolving
strategy, vision, and architecture that
continuously seek to align an organisation’s operations and direction with its
strategic business goals. The mechanism
by which it does so is by providing
rapid and easy access to actionable
information. It should not be equated
with dashboards and reports. The
purpose of reporting is to disseminate
volumes of mostly periodic backward
looking information in more or less
raw form across the organisation. In
contrast, BPM strives to provide much
more focused information about the
health of the organisation.

Taken together the following four
elements constitute the core of any
BPM exercise and they are at the heart
of the governance process of any organisation
(See Chart 1):
• Strategic Planning
• Annual Planning
• Business Performance Reporting
• Decision Analytics
In strategic planning (long-range
planning), an organisation sets its
direction over the next long term
(typically three to four years) period.
It sets for itself certain goals which are
quantified in the form of certain high
level metrics, the realisation of which
will be the objective of the organisation.
It makes decisions on allocating
its resources to pursue this strategy.
The annual planning process takes
a slice of the objectives as laid out
in the strategic plan and orients the
organisation towards meeting those
objectives for the next year. Unlike
the strategic plan, the annual planning
process is more comprehensive
and all-encompassing. Each business,
department, and function within the
organisation prepares its own plan
outlining its own initiatives and goals
in quantified metrics and targets. An
annual plan will typically have both
financial and non-financial metrics.
The financial metrics are decomposed
into the annual budget. Both financial
as well as non-financial metrics are
cascaded down the levels such that
they form the performance measures
against which an individual’s accomplishments
will be appraised.

BPM is a
constantly evolving
strategy, vision,
and architecture
that continuously
seeks to align an
organisation’s
operations and
direction with
its strategic
business goals by
providing access
to actionable
information
 |
|
The best plans are worth nothing
unless the organisation works towards
achieving the targeted numbers.
Progress against the plan is tracked
in the form of business performance reports. It is important to constantly
monitor progress against plan and
report variances when they exceed an
agreed threshold. Monitoring should
focus on drivers which are lead indicators
(for example, customer footfalls
at a retail store) which provide a forward-
looking view towards business
and facilitate decision making, rather
than lag indicators (for example, market
share) which provide a summary
of performance based on past business
decisions. Use the popular traffic
lights metaphor to show the status of
variance for each measure in ‘green’,
‘yellow’, and ‘red’. This helps in better
utilisation of management time by
focusing on identified problem areas
instead of absolute numbers. The last important constituent
of BPM is the ability to do business
analytics. The rich and relevant dataset
and driver tree allow organisations
to gain insights based on past
performance. Using a combination of
simulation, optimisation, and other
approaches, business analytics helps
in iterative exploration and investigation,
and drives business planning.
This acts as an important aid in the
decision making process, especially
where managing large data sets
significantly improve the quality of
decisions. |
Driver-based approach
How often has the word ‘dashboard’
crossed your mind while
discussing BPM? We have a tendency
of associating - if not equating – BPM
with dashboards. A dashboard, like
a car’s cockpit, provides us with a
snapshot view of what is the current
status such as speed and remaining
fuel, among other things. It does not
provide us with sufficient information
to drive a car. It does not tell us
anything about our location, direction,
and rate of acceleration, or what we
need to do next in order to reach our
objective. A more accurate metaphor
for BPM will be the navigation system
of an aircraft, which not only tells the
pilot the current speed, altitude, and
fuel burn, among other things, but the
sophisticated radar and other navigation
systems also tell the pilot the route
traversed, weather conditions, the
direction, and the distance to the next
waypoint. In short, none of us would
ever try to drive solely by watching
the dashboard, and yet it is possible
to fly an entire route in an aircraft on
instrumentation alone.
Since a BPM framework is really
a corporate navigational system, the
best way to design it is to think of it as
a map. Think of your strategic goals as
the end destinations. On your journey
towards that destination you would
have to pass through multiple locations,
each of which represent intermediate
objectives, which are things that
have to be accomplished in order to
get the end results. Objectives whether
intermediate or end-objectives are
represented as outcome metrics in the
BPM framework.
Now focus on all the factors which
you can control in order to reach the
destination. For instance, one can
control the starting time, direction
taken, speed of travel, number of refuel
stops, among others which will
decide if and when you reach your
destination. In a BPM world, these
are your drivers. Metrics and drivers
together constitute your BPM value
tree (See Chart 2) and their usage for
performance management is referred
to as a driver-based approach.
Outcome metrics link to company
strategy, guide desired decisions and behaviours, and can be tied explicitly
to actionable drivers. While selecting
metrics ensure that you select a limited
number of drivers that measure success
as relevant to your business and
can be universally understood.
Drivers serve as a leading indicator
for the outcome metric. Each outcome
metric may be influenced by multiple
drivers, not all of which may be
equally relevant. It is possible to model
sensitivity analysis to evaluate the percentage
change in the outcome metric
for any given change in each driver.
Focus on drivers that cause significant
change in the outcome metric.

|
Advantages of driver-based
approach
The advantages of a driver-based
approach towards BPM are many and
organisations can improve decisionmaking
across the company through
driver-based insight and scenario
testing:
-
Strategic alignment: Outcome
metrics are aligned with corporate
strategy and drivers reflect real and
important factors pertinent to the
business. Strategy can be finetuned
by driver-based scenario testing. It
helps to integrate planning across
multiple outcomes such as market
share, growth, shareholder returns,
and profitability and also helps in
managing detail in an explicitly
hierarchical design.
- Increased accountability: The value tree illustrates explicit linkages
between strategic goals, planned
commitments, and actual reported
in the same driver structure and
aids in quicker focus, faster decision
making, and to hold executives
accountable. All targets are driverbased,
and any ‘stretch’ is explicit.
- Orientation toward growth: Driver-
based business plans and forecasts
are created to confirm and
exploit growth opportunities. The
scenario evaluation mechanisms
help prioritise investment towards
best growth and returns.
|
  |

BPM is a
powerful force
and with the right
measures aligned
at the right levels
it can significantly
influence
organisational
alignment, unearth
problems, influence
culture, and
generally catalyse
organisation
performance
 |
Establishing the right outcome
metrics to value driver tree is just as
essential a component of successful
strategic execution as defining the right
strategy for your organisation. Trying
to execute without the right outcome
metrics and drivers or using the wrong
ones is like embarking on a road trip to
an unknown destination without taking
along a map. It will cost you more
time, more effort, and more frustration
en route, and you will have to be lucky
to reach your destination.
Conclusion
BPM is a powerful force and with
the right measures aligned at the right
levels it can significantly influence
organisational alignment, unearth
problems, influence culture, and
generally catalyse organisation performance.
However, in order to achieve
these benefits, organisations need
to recognise BPM projects as crossorganisational
business initiatives
and avoid excessive tool orientation.
Success lies in identifying objective
outcome metrics and their significant
drivers in relevant business terms that
are meaningful to stakeholders. |